Update HTML Tidy package
As a maintainer of HTML Tidy how can I help update the out of date 2009 to say https:/
Question information
- Language:
- English Edit question
- Status:
- Answered
- For:
- Ubuntu tidy Edit question
- Assignee:
- No assignee Edit question
- Last query:
- Last reply:
Revision history for this message
|
#1 |
I suggest you report a bug. State the version is EOL and that an update is required.
Thanks
Revision history for this message
|
#2 |
As a maintainer of HTML Tidy are you seriously suggesting I file a bug report
every time I do a tidy release? For how many distributions of unix, linux,
MAC, Windows, ... times versions, do I need to check?
Do not think so? Distribution updates should not depend on bug reports! This
does not even answer the question?
Revision history for this message
|
#3 |
The process is that you can file a bug so than somebody can update it. New features are also bugs, too. Bugs can also marked with wishlist.
Revision history for this message
|
#4 |
You should take into account, that Ubuntu is taking over software from Debian. As far as I can see, also Debian is still on the 20091213 version of tidy, with bug reports http://
You might try getting in touch with the maintainer if the tidy package in Ubuntu and Debian.
see also Ubuntu bug https:/
Is it already clear whether the new version should replace the old one (with sufficient backward compatibility), or if a separate package (maybe tidy5 or tidy-html5) has to be created?
Revision history for this message
|
#5 |
Hi Torsten, Manfred,
Thanks for your replies, especially the bug pointers - very edifying!
Just to be clear about some old, odd things read here and there -
Canonical for HTML Tidy as of 2015-January-15:
site: http://
source: https:/
binaries: http://
bugs: https:/
list: https:/
api: http://
quickref: http://
first release: https:/
last release: https:/
I am trying the suggestion to get in touch with the maintainer,
which I think is Jason. We will see how this turns out...
Revision history for this message
|
#6 |
This question was expired because it remained in the 'Open' state without activity for the last 15 days.
Revision history for this message
|
#7 |
I am still hopeful to get in touch with the maintainer, Jason - sent an email 2 weeks ago, but this is the holiday season...
Anyone else with an idea on how to get HTML Tidy distribution updated?
Revision history for this message
|
#8 |
This question was expired because it remained in the 'Open' state without activity for the last 15 days.
Revision history for this message
|
#9 |
Well I have resent my email to Jason... do not know what else I can do... any suggestions, please...
Revision history for this message
|
#10 |
Maybe you have better chances to reach the maintainer via the Debian channels.
Revision history for this message
|
#11 |
Hi Manfred,
Again thank you for the taking the time to answer...
But it was also you that pointed out that I think it
is already registered on Debian channels...
https:/
This has been open since Jan 2012, and I have now posted
a new message there... And you can see I also sent my reply
to each of the other emails mentioned there - Jason,
Dan (jidanni), KAcper, Daniel...
We will see what that brings ;=))
Regards,
Geoff.
Revision history for this message
|
#12 |
This question was expired because it remained in the 'Open' state without activity for the last 15 days.
Revision history for this message
|
#13 |
Please, is there anyone out there that can help in this?
Tidy has really move on since the current 2009 cvs version offered.
Pleas HELP!
Revision history for this message
|
#14 |
When searching on the Debian pages, I cannot find any activity of the Debian maintainer of the tidy package in the past two years.
http://
On the Debian pages there are some pages dealing with the case that a Maintainer seems to be neglecting his duties or cannot be reached, see http://
I suggest you contact the MIA team.
Revision history for this message
|
#15 |
Hi Manfred,
Re: Update HTML Tidy package
Thank you for help searching around for a solution to this... you
are a great help...
In fact your search link leads to an email from Jason, clearly
saying he no longer has time to maintain HTML Tidy, dated 2011-06-01
01:05:31 GMT
http://
So am also sending this to the MIA team -
Dear MIA Team,
Hi, I hope you can help HTML Tidy.
Back in 2011-06-01 Jason advised he no longer has time to maintain
HTML Tidy. Manfred's search reveals his last action was in 2013 -
http://
I do not know your process in choosing a new maintainer, but note
for example that Daniel offers his help, twice -
https:/
and
https:/
Hope you can help get HTML Tidy updated, when you get a chance.
Last release: https:/
Regards,
Geoff.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Manfred Hampl <
<email address hidden>> wrote:
> Your question #276623 on tidy in Ubuntu changed:
> https:/
>
> Status: Open => Answered
>
> Manfred Hampl proposed the following answer:
> When searching on the Debian pages, I cannot find any activity of the
> Debian maintainer of the tidy package in the past two years.
>
>
> http://
> shows the last activity in March 2013
>
> On the Debian pages there are some pages dealing with the case that a
> Maintainer seems to be neglecting his duties or cannot be reached, see
> http://
> and https:/
>
> I suggest you contact the MIA team.
>
> --
> If this answers your question, please go to the following page to let us
> know that it is solved:
>
> https:/
>
> If you still need help, you can reply to this email or go to the
> following page to enter your feedback:
> https:/
>
> You received this question notification because you asked the question.
>
Revision history for this message
|
#16 |
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 05:38:37PM +0100, Geoff McLane wrote:
> Hi Manfred,
>
> Re: Update HTML Tidy package
>
> Thank you for help searching around for a solution to this... you
> are a great help...
>
> In fact your search link leads to an email from Jason, clearly
> saying he no longer has time to maintain HTML Tidy, dated 2011-06-01
> 01:05:31 GMT
> http://
>
> So am also sending this to the MIA team -
>
> Dear MIA Team,
>
> Hi, I hope you can help HTML Tidy.
>
> Back in 2011-06-01 Jason advised he no longer has time to maintain
> HTML Tidy. Manfred's search reveals his last action was in 2013 -
> http://
>
> I do not know your process in choosing a new maintainer, but note
> for example that Daniel offers his help, twice -
> https:/
> and
> https:/
>
> Hope you can help get HTML Tidy updated, when you get a chance.
The MIA team doesn't "choose" a new maintainer, the most it can do is
orphaning a package, and usually that's a really lenghty process.
Whoever wants to adopt (and *maintain*) it, I think he should feel free
to do so, given the maintainer words in
https:/
above).
If he is not a Debian developer, that's not really a problem, just find
a DD willing to sponsor such update, or otherwise send a RFS (request
for sponsorship), as usual.
--
regards,
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: http://
Launchpad user: https:/
Debian QA page: https:/
Revision history for this message
|
#17 |
Hi Mattia, hi Jason,
> Whoever wants to adopt (and *maintain*) it, I think he should feel free
> to do so, given the maintainer words in
> https:/
I'm willing to adopt the tidy package, and would suggest it for
collab-maint, as I am not a Debian Developer:
https:/
Cheers!
Daniel
Revision history for this message
|
#18 |
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for this... let me know anything I can do as a Tidy maintainer to help...
Regards,
Geoff.
Revision history for this message
|
#19 |
This question was expired because it remained in the 'Open' state without activity for the last 15 days.
Revision history for this message
|
#20 |
Hi Daniel,
How is this CollabMain going? Have you found a 'sponsor' or whatever else needed?
As stated, let me know anything I can do as a Tidy maintainer to assist...
Regards,
Geoff.
Revision history for this message
|
#21 |
I really agree that the package should be updated.
Revision history for this message
|
#22 |
@milasudril, thank you for your support in this...
Anything you can do to help in this would be most appreciated...
Revision history for this message
|
#23 |
This question was expired because it remained in the 'Open' state without activity for the last 15 days.
Revision history for this message
|
#24 |
*** HELP *** HELP *** HELP ***
Does **nobody** care that Ubuntu still offers a 2009 package of Tidy?
When 2015 releases are available - https:/
Has Daniel's offer to take over orphaned Tidy been accepted? Being worked on? Any indication when this might happen?
As repeated, repeated, is there anything I can do as a Tidy maintainer to assist?
Somebody please HELP!
Regards,
Geoff.
Revision history for this message
|
#25 |
This question was expired because it remained in the 'Open' state without activity for the last 15 days.
Revision history for this message
|
#26 |
*******
STILL WAITING FOR SOME ACTION BY SOMEBODY!
*******
Revision history for this message
|
#27 |
This question was expired because it remained in the 'Open' state without activity for the last 15 days.
Revision history for this message
|
#28 |
Hi Daniel,
As can be seen here - https:/
am trying to script a DEB build... one that passes `lintian`... I seem to have
narrowed it down to a few remaining issues...
Maybe you could help with this? Then when/if you take over orphaned Tidy
distribution, the ground work would have been done...
Or maybe you or others could point me to some good tutorials on building
an acceptable DEB... thanks...
Geoff.
Revision history for this message
|
#29 |
There are links to Debian and Ubuntu policy on http://
(Section: should probably be "libs" or "web")
If you look at the previous tidy package in Ubuntu, you will see that there are different binary packages built from one source. (tidy, tidy-doc, libtidy-0.99-0, libtidy-dev, etc.). Maybe that is the right way to go also for the new version.
Revision history for this message
|
#30 |
Thanks Manfred for the link... will certainly read more there... and some things seen look promising...
Concerning the different packages, for our **own** publishing on http://
For Ubuntu and Debian distributions I guess that would be a decision made by the **maintainer**... that we are still looking for...
Again, thanks for the link, but the basic question of updating those distributions remains open...
Revision history for this message
|
#31 |
This question was expired because it remained in the 'Open' state without activity for the last 15 days.
Revision history for this message
|
#32 |
Did I mention we have released 5.2.0
https:/
An Ubuntu/Debian **update** becomes more needed...
Revision history for this message
|
#33 |
This question was expired because it remained in the 'Open' state without activity for the last 15 days.
Revision history for this message
|
#34 |
This question remains UNANSWERED!
Revision history for this message
|
#35 |
This question was expired because it remained in the 'Open' state without activity for the last 15 days.
Revision history for this message
|
#36 |
Hi janitor,
Well we have made some progress since last - see this link - https:/
We seem to be slowly getting there...
Revision history for this message
|
#37 |
This question was expired because it remained in the 'Open' state without activity for the last 15 days.
Revision history for this message
|
#38 |
Sorry Mr Janitor for the delay on this...
It does **seem** to be moving forward...
Thanks for your patience...
Revision history for this message
|
#39 |
This question was expired because it remained in the 'Open' state without activity for the last 15 days.
Revision history for this message
|
#40 |
Hopefully a little more time, until some debian issues are sorted out...
But the overall view is this is moving forward... on the many links given...
Just some patience... every 15 days can sometimes be too often... but no problem..
Revision history for this message
|
#41 |
Please use a bug next time to request an update since Ubuntu packagers don't track the Launchpad Answers system. You can tag your bug with 'upgrade-
Revision history for this message
|
#42 |
The new version is now in Ubuntu's -proposed development repository.
Can you help with this problem?
Provide an answer of your own, or ask Geoff R. McLane for more information if necessary.