Large NLO / LO ratio in z at LHC

Asked by Laura Buonincontri

Dear experts,

I am trying to calculate the increment in the p p -> Z + (Z+jet) production cross section between LO and NLO.
I saw in some presentations that it should be around 25-30% ( for example slide 95 in https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwi9uvi6i-GBAxUKa_EDHZeoDeAQFnoECBgQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fidpasc.lip.pt%2Fuploads%2Ftalk%2Ffile%2F184%2Ftutorial-IDPASC-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw25o9hJztgCfBDT3p-3o2gs&opi=89978449).

At LO I am generating the process in this way:
import model loop_sm-ckm
generate p p > z @0
add process p p > z j @1

At NLO I am generating the process in this way:
import model loop_sm-ckm
generate p p > z [QCD] @0
add process p p > z j [QCD] @1

In both the run cards I set the pt min of jets to 5 GeV and the etaj max to 5. I found a LO cross section of 44470 pb and at NLO of 93470 pb, that is a factor 2.2 greater than the LO.

I also tried to do some attempts, on the basis of other questions done in this forum.
I tried to fix the renormalization and factorization scale. By default I see in the run card:

 False = fixed_ren_scale ! if .true. use fixed ren scale
  False = fixed_fac_scale ! if .true. use fixed fac scale
  91.118 = mur_ref_fixed ! fixed ren reference scale
  91.118 = muf_ref_fixed ! fixed fact reference scale

I tried to change to True the first two lines, but when I launch the process, a warning tells me that they are again set to False since I am using the FxFxmerging.

Then I tried to change the production process into:

generate p p > mu+ mu- @0
add process p p > mu+ mu- j @1

and set
40.0 = mmll ! min invariant mass of l+l- (same flavour) lepton pair.
I did the same for NLO and put the same minimum pt and eta as before. The cross sections are now:
1707 pb at LO
3325 pb at NLO.

So again, it seems too much to me this increment.

I suspect that I am doing something wrong with the NLO case, maybe there are some other parameters that have to be set differently.

Any suggestion is welcome.
Thank you,

Laura

Question information

Language:
English Edit question
Status:
Answered
For:
MadGraph5_aMC@NLO Edit question
Assignee:
No assignee Edit question
Last query:
Last reply:
Revision history for this message
Olivier Mattelaer (olivier-mattelaer) said :
#1

Hi,

Did you compare the cross-section before or after the parton-shower?
Both MLM and FxFx needs to run a veto algorithm (part of the parton-shower)
which reduces the cross-section to the physical one.

Cheers,

Olivier

> On 6 Oct 2023, at 11:40, Laura Buonincontri <email address hidden> wrote:
>
> New question #708127 on MadGraph5_aMC@NLO:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/mg5amcnlo/+question/708127
>
> Dear experts,
>
> I am trying to calculate the increment in the p p -> Z + (Z+jet) production cross section between LO and NLO.
> I saw in some presentations that it should be around 25-30% ( for example slide 95 in https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwi9uvi6i-GBAxUKa_EDHZeoDeAQFnoECBgQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fidpasc.lip.pt%2Fuploads%2Ftalk%2Ffile%2F184%2Ftutorial-IDPASC-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw25o9hJztgCfBDT3p-3o2gs&opi=89978449).
>
> At LO I am generating the process in this way:
> import model loop_sm-ckm
> generate p p > z @0
> add process p p > z j @1
>
>
> At NLO I am generating the process in this way:
> import model loop_sm-ckm
> generate p p > z [QCD] @0
> add process p p > z j [QCD] @1
>
> In both the run cards I set the pt min of jets to 5 GeV and the etaj max to 5. I found a LO cross section of 44470 pb and at NLO of 93470 pb, that is a factor 2.2 greater than the LO.
>
> I also tried to do some attempts, on the basis of other questions done in this forum.
> I tried to fix the renormalization and factorization scale. By default I see in the run card:
>
> False = fixed_ren_scale ! if .true. use fixed ren scale
> False = fixed_fac_scale ! if .true. use fixed fac scale
> 91.118 = mur_ref_fixed ! fixed ren reference scale
> 91.118 = muf_ref_fixed ! fixed fact reference scale
>
> I tried to change to True the first two lines, but when I launch the process, a warning tells me that they are again set to False since I am using the FxFxmerging.
>
> Then I tried to change the production process into:
>
> generate p p > mu+ mu- @0
> add process p p > mu+ mu- j @1
>
> and set
> 40.0 = mmll ! min invariant mass of l+l- (same flavour) lepton pair.
> I did the same for NLO and put the same minimum pt and eta as before. The cross sections are now:
> 1707 pb at LO
> 3325 pb at NLO.
>
> So again, it seems too much to me this increment.
>
> I suspect that I am doing something wrong with the NLO case, maybe there are some other parameters that have to be set differently.
>
> Any suggestion is welcome.
> Thank you,
>
> Laura
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> You received this question notification because you are an answer
> contact for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.

Revision history for this message
Laura Buonincontri (laurabuonincontri) said :
#2

Dear Olivier,

I was comparing the cross-section before the parton shower. I desabled pythia8, since this error was occuring:

launch auto
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python3.8/shutil.py", line 791, in move
    os.rename(src, real_dst)
FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/home/user/madgraph/MG5_aMC_v3.4.0/MG5_aMC_v3_4_0/z_nlo/MCatNLO/RUN_PYTHIA8_1/events.hepmc.gz' -> '/home/user/madgraph/MG5_aMC_v3.4.0/MG5_aMC_v3_4_0/z_nlo/Events/run_01/events_PYTHIA8_0.hepmc.gz'

During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/user/madgraph/MG5_aMC_v3.4.0/MG5_aMC_v3_4_0/madgraph/interface/amcatnlo_run_interface.py", line 4090, in run_mcatnlo
    files.mv(os.path.join(rundir, 'events.%s.gz' % ext), hep_file)
  File "/home/user/madgraph/MG5_aMC_v3.4.0/MG5_aMC_v3_4_0/madgraph/iolibs/files.py", line 186, in mv
    shutil.move(path1, path2)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.8/shutil.py", line 811, in move
    copy_function(src, real_dst)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.8/shutil.py", line 435, in copy2
    copyfile(src, dst, follow_symlinks=follow_symlinks)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.8/shutil.py", line 264, in copyfile
    with open(src, 'rb') as fsrc, open(dst, 'wb') as fdst:
FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/home/user/madgraph/MG5_aMC_v3.4.0/MG5_aMC_v3_4_0/z_nlo/MCatNLO/RUN_PYTHIA8_1/events.hepmc.gz'

During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/user/madgraph/MG5_aMC_v3.4.0/MG5_aMC_v3_4_0/madgraph/interface/extended_cmd.py", line 1544, in onecmd
    return self.onecmd_orig(line, **opt)
  File "/home/user/madgraph/MG5_aMC_v3.4.0/MG5_aMC_v3_4_0/madgraph/interface/extended_cmd.py", line 1493, in onecmd_orig
    return func(arg, **opt)
  File "/home/user/madgraph/MG5_aMC_v3.4.0/MG5_aMC_v3_4_0/madgraph/interface/amcatnlo_run_interface.py", line 1805, in do_launch
    self.run_mcatnlo(evt_file, options)
  File "/home/user/madgraph/MG5_aMC_v3.4.0/MG5_aMC_v3_4_0/madgraph/interface/amcatnlo_run_interface.py", line 4106, in run_mcatnlo
    raise aMCatNLOError('No file has been generated, an error occurred.'+\
madgraph.interface.amcatnlo_run_interface.aMCatNLOError: No file has been generated, an error occurred. More information in /home/user/madgraph/MG5_aMC_v3.4.0/MG5_aMC_v3_4_0/amcatnlo_run.log
Value of current Options:
             pythia8_path : /home/user/madgraph/MG5_aMC_v3.4.0/MG5_aMC_v3_4_0/HEPTools/pythia8
                hwpp_path : None
              thepeg_path : None
               hepmc_path : None
         madanalysis_path : None
        madanalysis5_path : None
          pythia-pgs_path : None
               rivet_path : None
                yoda_path : None
              contur_path : None
                  td_path : None
             delphes_path : /home/user/madgraph/MG5_aMC_v3.4.0/MG5_aMC_v3_4_0/Delphes
      exrootanalysis_path : /home/user/madgraph/MG5_aMC_v3.4.0/MG5_aMC_v3_4_0/ExRootAnalysis
             syscalc_path : None
                  timeout : 60
              web_browser : None
               eps_viewer : None
              text_editor : None
         fortran_compiler : None
            f2py_compiler : None
        f2py_compiler_py2 : None
        f2py_compiler_py3 : None
             cpp_compiler : None
             cluster_type : condor
            cluster_queue : None
    cluster_status_update : (600, 30)
                  fastjet : None
                    golem : None
                  samurai : None
                    ninja : /home/user/madgraph/MG5_aMC_v3.4.0/MG5_aMC_v3_4_0/HEPTools/lib
                  collier : /home/user/madgraph/MG5_aMC_v3.4.0/MG5_aMC_v3_4_0/HEPTools/lib
                   lhapdf : /home/user/madgraph/MG5_aMC_v3.4.0/MG5_aMC_v3_4_0/HEPTools/lhapdf6_py3/bin/lhapdf-config
                 pineappl : pineappl
               lhapdf_py2 : None
               lhapdf_py3 : /home/user/madgraph/MG5_aMC_v3.4.0/MG5_aMC_v3_4_0/HEPTools/lhapdf6_py3/bin/lhapdf-config
        cluster_temp_path : None
mg5amc_py8_interface_path : /home/user/madgraph/MG5_aMC_v3.4.0/MG5_aMC_v3_4_0/HEPTools/MG5aMC_PY8_interface
       cluster_local_path : None
                      OLP : MadLoop
         cluster_nb_retry : 1
       cluster_retry_wait : 300
             cluster_size : 100
      output_dependencies : external
           crash_on_error : False
       auto_convert_model : False
 acknowledged_v3.1_syntax : False
       group_subprocesses : Auto
ignore_six_quark_processes : False
low_mem_multicore_nlo_generation : False
      complex_mass_scheme : False
include_lepton_initiated_processes : False
                    gauge : unitary
             stdout_level : 20
    loop_optimized_output : True
         loop_color_flows : False
   max_npoint_for_channel : 0
  default_unset_couplings : 99
        max_t_for_channel : 99
       zerowidth_tchannel : True
      nlo_mixed_expansion : True
              auto_update : 7
   automatic_html_opening : False
                 run_mode : 2
                  nb_core : 4
      notification_center : True
                 mg5_path : /home/user/madgraph/MG5_aMC_v3.4.0/MG5_aMC_v3_4_0

I have to find the solution for this then!

Thank you

Laura

Revision history for this message
Laura Buonincontri (laurabuonincontri) said :
#3

Dear Olivier,

I finally have been able to run the NLO with pythia8, I see that at the end the cross section from FxFx merging is written and is lower than the one calculated before pythia8.
After many pyhton8 re-installation and attempts I have understood that it was a matter of linux version. I tried to run it on another computer and the error message above was solved. Thank you for your hints!!

Now, I would like to calculate also the acceptance for the process p p > z > b b~ + p p > z j > b b~ j, by requiring at least two jets in the eta range between 2.2 and 4.2 and compare it between LO and NLO.
I would like to understand how to make the z correctly decay. I mean, I tried this:

generate p p > z [QCD] z > b b~ @0
add process p p > z j [QCD] z > b b~@1

but this error is printed:

Error detected in "add process p p > z j [QCD] z > b b~ @1"
write debug file MG5_debug
If you need help with this issue please contact us on https://answers.launchpad.net/mg5amcnlo
str :
        Automatic process-order determination lead to negative constraints:
        QED: 20, QCD: -18
        Please specify the coupling orders from the command line.

Honestly I am not sure about how to solve this.

Do you have any hint for this?

Thank you,

Laura

Revision history for this message
Olivier Mattelaer (olivier-mattelaer) said :
#4

At NLO, you can either let the Z decay within the Parton-shower or via MadSpin.
MadSpin has full spin-correlation (not the case for the parton-shower at least in general) but you can not enforce cuts at generation level.

Cheers,

Olivier

Can you help with this problem?

Provide an answer of your own, or ask Laura Buonincontri for more information if necessary.

To post a message you must log in.