Ubuntu Installation: WUBI vs Side by Side Partition (Duo boot)?

This question was discussed in this form: http://ubuntuforums.org/archive/index.php/t-1399878.html

Text from the forum:

View Full Version : [ubuntu] wubi vs dual booting

UncleMonty
February 6th, 2010, 02:44 PM
What are the pros and cons of using wubi instead of dual booting?
llawwehttam
February 6th, 2010, 02:55 PM
WUBI is installed inside windows and therefore depends on windows. I would dual boot every time.
If you get a kernel update in wubi it can kill both systems and it is quite unstable.

You could always use virtualbox as a third option.
MelDJ
February 6th, 2010, 04:11 PM
think of wubi as installing ubuntu as an application in windows.
if windows crashes, it too is gone.
and it doesn't get its own filesystem. so you don't get the benefits of ext
OrangeCrate
February 6th, 2010, 04:19 PM
Agreeing with the previous posts, I think Wubi is generally used just to check out a distro, rather than being considered as a long-term install option.

IMO, dual booting is always the best option. See here for some guidance, if your interested in trying it:

http://ubuntuguide.org/wiki/Ubuntu:Karmic#Dual-Booting_Windows_and_Ubuntu
lidex
February 6th, 2010, 04:52 PM
Agreeing with the previous posts, I think Wubi is generally used just to check out a distro, rather than being considered as a long-term install option.

IMO, dual booting is always the best option. See here for some guidance, if your interested in trying it:

http://ubuntuguide.org/wiki/Ubuntu:Karmic#Dual-Booting_Windows_and_Ubuntu

Absolutely. Call it a preview ;)
2hot6ft2
February 6th, 2010, 05:03 PM
I've never even tried a wubi install. I just can't see installing Ubuntu inside Windows and having Windows crash taking Ubuntu with it. Dual booting is the way to go. I dual and triple boot my machines if they even have Windows at all.
minws
February 6th, 2010, 05:55 PM
Hi,

Wubi is unstable, don't think about upgrading the kernel and you will not be able to boot to ubuntu. I don't agree though that is for testing, for testing is the live cd, installation inside virtualbox or a live usb stick. I personally use wubi because I like to keep my windows system as it is,as ubuntu are unstable sometimes, meaning that is not 100% that your system is going to be the same after upgrade. So I'm using the great tools from the linux community and a 99% great os and if the system crashes I'm reinstaling from inside windows.
Mark Phelps
February 8th, 2010, 06:10 PM
While I personally advocate NOT using Wubi (for all the reasons already cited), you should be aware that one of the Advantages of using Wubi is that you don't have to mess around with partitioning -- and running the risk of corrupting Vista (or Win7) and rendering them unbootable.

If you do decide to dual-boot, search the forums for threads on this first and be sure to use the Vista (or Win7) builtin Disk Management utility to shrink the OS partition. Don't fall for the temptation of using the Ubuntu installer to do a side-by-side installation that involves resizing your MS Windows OS partition.

However, that said, if you're using Windows XP, you should be OK with letting the Ubuntu installer resize your OS partition.
Alex Libman
February 8th, 2010, 06:35 PM
I disagree with the terminology used on this thread. Wubi (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wubi_%28Ubuntu_installer%29) is a way to install Linux for multi-booting (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multi_boot) with Windows (dual, triple, or otherwise). The alternative to multi-booting is installing only one host OS, and running any other OS'es through an emulator (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emulator) instead, which is not how Wubi works. What I think this thread compares is using dedicated partitioning (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disk_partitioning) vs the loopmounted device (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loop_device) method that Wubi allows.

The loopmount method is easier for new users to set up, because it doesn't resize or create any physical partitions, but it has some minor stability and speed disadvantages, and hibernation is not supported. It also creates complications in cases of fragmentation, or if you ever decide to resize or uninstall your Windows partition. Having OS'es on different partitions is also great for ghosting (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disk_cloning) and virtualization (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Full_virtualization) purposes as well.

So I think that intermediate-level users should try something like Parted Magic (http://partedmagic.com/) (FOSS) or the EaseUs Partition Manager (http://www.partition-tool.com/personal.htm) (proprietary FreeWare) to shrink their Windows partition instead.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.

Solved

More research on wubi vs duo boot is here:

http://askubuntu.com/questions/161033/what-are-the-benefits-of-a-disk-install-vs-wubi-and-can-i-migrate-my-settings